
With a title like that the filmmakers could so easily have given us an Orwellian superhero dystopia (‘Gin soaked tears poured down his face. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Wonder Woman’). But, alas, they decided to go a different way.
The story for this one is centred on a magic wishing crystal, a cluster of coloured plasticky lozenges that grants you, thanks to the sublime and plot-needful Powers of Arbitrarium, just the one wish. In Aladdin the Robin Williams genie prefaces his wish-offer with some qualifications and exceptions: you can't bring anyone back from the dead, you can't make anyone fall in love with you, and ‘ix nix on the wishing for more wishes’. Nobody in Wonder Woman 1984 wishes for anyone to fall in love with them, but the movie gaily violates the other two restrictions. Indeed, WW herself wishes her old boyfriend back from the dead. This is accomplished by having his spirit, or something, occupying the body of a character listed on IMDB only as ‘Handsome Man’. Since every time Diana looks at him she sees the face of Chris Pratt, Pine, Hemsworth (whichever one it is, they all look alike to me) this seemed to me a missed equal-opportunity moment. Speaking as an individual notably challenged in the pulchritude department, would it have been so hard for them to bung Steve in the body of an Ugly Man? We exist too, you know.
Anyway, the more obvious of the film's two villains, Pedro Pascal in a shiny 80s suit (a sort of Bernie Madoff/Young Donald Trump confidence trickster quote-unquote ‘businessman’ type) gets round the ix nix on wishing for more wishes by wishing literally to become the magic wish-granting crystal. His wish is granted, which leaves him afterwards looking like Pedro Pascal in a cheap suit and not, as I would have preferred, the crystal itself, perhaps with some googly-eyes stuck on. This new identity, by a sleight-of-screenplay, enables him to coax people into wishing for things on him so that he can, as it were, take his cut. I mean, it's hard to see how this is supposed to work, but alright.
At any rate it makes Pedro super wealthy, powerful and leads to a showdown in which he broadcasts to the whole world from a secret TV studio that has the power (presumably somebody at some point wished for this) to override all other TV broadcasts. He offers everyone one wish, thereby skimming the 15% of topslice wish, or however that works, becoming more and more powerful as he does so. Given this opportunity, people say things like ‘I wish to be king’, ‘I wish my nagging wife would drop dead’ and ‘I wish I had nuclear weapons’—loads of people wish for this latter, actually, which puts the nervy people in US and Russian nuclear command in the situation of having to fire off their national stock of the things. Armageddon beckons.
Diana, weakened by having her Chris-wish granted, repudiates it, sending her former boyf down, we assume, to Hades (it's worth remembering that the Greek underworld, which is presumably the one Greek warrior Diana believes in, is a most unappealing place: dark, dreary and entropic. When Odysseus encounters the dead Achilles down there and asks him what it's like, he replies ‘I would rather be the meanest slave of the poorest pig-farmer on earth and be alive, than be king of all the lands of the dead.’ But Steve seems happy enough to expire, or re-expire).
Giving up her wish boosts Diana's Wonder-power, such that she can now fly, like Superman, which I'm pretty sure she couldn't do before. She also gets some impressive new golden armour, which I'm sorry to say made me go ‘Golden Wonder!’ and to snigger. That's just me, though.
The second of the film's villains is Kristen Wiig's Mousy Librarian Woman, although in this film she's Mousy Museum Woman, but you know: same difference. Her wish is to be as strong, powerful and sexy as Diana Prince, which wish is granted. For a while you think she's on the side of good, but then (hail, holy Arbitrarium!) it turns out she's not, and has thrown in her lot with Pedro Pascal. Then she gets a second wish, which surely violates the terms of the wishing-crystal contract, but there you go. This new wish is: to turn into a thundercat, a sort of half-woman-half-cheetah creature, which is just a fucking odd thing to wish for. Each to their own, I guess. Funky Feline and Wonder Woman have a fight, all the while Pedro is granting more and more wishes globally, spreading chaos further and further and precipitating the ever-impending nuclear apocaylpse.
My problem with this frantic, shrieking climax, all wind-machines and Pedro P over-acting villanous glee, is this: does literally everyone in the world wish for dead wives and nuclear weapons? Does literally nobody say ‘I wish this geezer had never had these powers’, thereby reverting the world to normality? Even if such a wish doesn't occur to any of the [does quick calculation on fingers] 6 billion people in the world, wouldn't it make sense for Diana to make such a wish? You might say: ah but she had her wish, when she wished for the bliss of a kiss with her Chris. But Kristen Wiig got a second wish. In the event, WW has to use the Lasso of Truth as, I think I'm right in saying, an antenna of some kind to hijack his broadcasting operation, and tell all the peoples of the world that they should repudiate their wishes and return to the authentic disappointments and thwartings of their old lives. Surprisingly, literally every single person on the planet, with no exceptions, agrees to this. Statistically unlikely, but hey: it's comics.
I wish I knew whether British pig Latin ends words with "-ix" rather than "-ay".
ReplyDeleteFunky Feline and Wonder Woman have a fight, all the while Pedro is granting more and more wishes globally
ReplyDeleteYes, yes, this is all very interesting, but I think I speak for many of your readers when I say I'm more interested in what you remember from after you woke up.
If that's the actual plot, it's a bold move by DC into the "magical tales of wonder retold by six-year-olds" space.
True story, bro. The movie's right there, if you want to check.
DeleteYikes.
DeleteIt reminds me of Supergirl - not because it's a superhero film with a female lead, but because...
[tries and fails to recall the plot]
[checks notes]
...wait a minute, they're the same film!
Well, nearly - and they both pull the move of saying "ah, but this is magic - yes I know this is a superhero story, but this is actual magic magic, it just is OK". Unforgiveable IMO. But maybe DC reckon that's what appeals to GURLS hem hem.
Having just seen this film, I would argue that they almost get away with it. The wishing stone concept nearly works: from a character standpoint, Diana’s wish to bring back her lover makes sense, as does Barbara’s wish to become like Diana. I concur with your points of ‘double dipping’ on the wishing stone. The story would have been more effective had they held to the original rules of the wishing stone, and made the costs of using the stone heavier. As it is the stone did whatever the plot needed it to do.
ReplyDeleteHowever there is one where the story is strong: the nature of the villains. With a significant amount of the super hero films, the villain is usually a Monster Who Deserves to Die. This applies to the human villains (such as the villain of Iron Man 3) as much to Thanos and the multitude of other CGI members of the rogue’s gallery. This is a reflection of our times I think: arguments online are very much us and them, good and evil, and everyone knows the other guys are evil.
The villains of WW84 are both human, tragic figures. They are drawn to their fate through their own weaknesses and failings, and have solid motivations for doing what they do: Max Lord through his own childhood and relationship with his son, Barbara as a response to years of being ignored and looked down upon. These villains are more akin to those of the Sam Raimi Spiderman films rather than recent Marvel or DC stories. It’s almost refreshing to see this again.
This isn’t for one minute arguing that the film is good - it really isn’t. The filmmakers fail badly in the execution of those stories.