
A series that multiplied with tribble-like pertinacity, McCaffrey's Dragonriders of Pern (1968-present) is a planetary romance in which certain special individuals (like you, trufan! and me!) have a telepathic bond with a breed of marvellous magical gigantic purring cats, sorry, fire-breathing dragons. Together, trufan and dracono-moggy defend the world of Pern against nasty 'threads' which periodically (the period being 50 years) rain down out of the sky from a nearby 'red star', threatening to devour all Pernian life. The initial idea, according to McCaffrey's son, was for a 'technologically regressed survival planet' whose inhabitants are united against a external threat in a way that wasn't true of America during the Vietnam War. 'The dragons became the biologically renewable air force, and their riders "the few" who, like the RAF pilots in World War Two, fought against incredible odds day in, day out—and won.'
As you can see from the cover, up there, this instalment in the series is 'The Story of Pern's Greatest Harpo', Robinton by name. Like all great Harpos, Robinton plays the harp. He also plays the flute, the 'gitar' (an instrument exactly like a 'guitar' although, obviously, without the 'u') and lots of other instruments too. He is, the novel tells us over and over again, a musical genius. He is, in point of fact, Amadeus:
He began to make a copy of the sonata ... he looked back over the score, to be sure he had annotated it properly. He paced back and forth, paused to pour himself a glass of wine, and then went back to the table and proceeded to copy out his Kasia songs. He finished those, drinking as he worked, and rolled up the music with a neat ribbon tying the packet. He had a final glass of wine, realizing dawn was not far away. [260]You may be thinking: this doesn't sound much like the Tolkien-plus-a-few-ancient-technological-artefacts worldbuilding idiom familiar from other Pern novels. And you would be right so to think. Robinton is sometimes presented as in effect a scop, scald or rhapsode, going from castle to castle, hall to hall, literally singing for his supper. But when it suits the novel's fancy he is a eighteenth-century genius composer, writing staves fluently upon an endless supply of animal hides, composing melodies that make people weep instantly. We have to take this latter much-repeated fact on trust, since no actual music is included. I assume Robinton composes in D-minor which is, as is well known, the saddest of all keys. His musical ability also gives him a special bond with the giant telepathic feline dragons, because everything that happens in these novels must relate to the dragons, because, you know. Duh. What else are the novels for?
The Masterharper of Pern tells Robinton's life story from his birth; his distant, disapproving father; his music training; his falling in love with beautiful green-eyed Kasia; their marriage; a disastrous boat trip after which Kasia catches a chill of which she subsequently dies. Robinton is made sad by this, although he's soon engaging in no-strings-attached shagging with slinky Silvana. Then, in an odd move, he has a brain-damaged son with Silvana. Then things heat up, fight-wise, as we near the end. Most of the fixtures and fittings are castles, potions, bejewelled daggers, swords, bows, arrows and the like; although McCaffrey also says things like 'the main Hall had excellent acoustics' [353], which isn't the sort of line you tend to find in Chaucer; and her characters wear 'heavy woollen socks' [276], items of clothing which aren't anachronistic yet somehow sound as if they should be. Plus her people are forever drinking cups of
The novel itself is 400-pages of meh, lifted a little from time to time by a few less-feeble-than-the-rest set-pieces (Robinton and Kasia in the boat on the storm isn't bad; and some of the fighting near the end is readable). Mostly the problem is one of style. From time to time, McCaffrey remembers that she's writing a cod-medieval dragon-packed planetary adventure and wrenches her style into inelegances of the 'many of the capping slabs were athwart the expanse' [294] or 'he asked for conveyance a-dragonback' [336] kind. But the bulk of the novel is written in a could-not-be-blander grey contemporary prose, stitched together almost entirely out of cliché. Cliché is everything in this novel: the characters, the settings, the events, nothing is here to make you see things freshly or to startle you out of your comfortable familiarity. Hardly a page goes by when the author does not fall back, consciously or otherwise, on an inert, clogging, conventionalised phrase. This character finds himself 'between a rock and a hard place' [51]; that other has 'a vice-like grip' [91]. If there is a silence it must be 'a stunned silence' [109], or indeed 'an awful, stunned silence' [345]. Characters 'rue the day' [172], 'stifle a laugh' [195], promise to 'show him the error of his ways' [222]. Men have 'rugged good looks' [231] and everybody 'cocks their head' at things. Actually, people in this novel are forever cocking their heads ('he cocked his head at Robinton, a sly grin on his rugged, weathered face' 236; 'cocking her head', 256; 'Nip cocked his head', 357; 'Tick cocked his head hopefully', 375). Rather than leave, people 'steal away' [272]; storms have exactly the properties you would expect them to have ('in the teeth of the gale ... driving rain' 273); coughs are 'hacking coughs' [304] and people 'refuse to dignify that question with an answer' [287]. Martin Amis once declared that the primary business of a writer was to wage war on cliché. Stylistically speaking, McCaffrey evidently preferred, as far as that went, to give peace a chance. A slack, underwhelming novel.
Shouldn't that be "vise-like grip"?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I liked some of the early Pern books, especially the ones featuring Menolly, though when she got older and started having love affairs I got bored because when I was a teen girls weren't always expected to like love stories (okay, they probably were, but my parents forgot to instill in me the need to care what other people thought I should like). And her "adult"-focused (because they had implied sexings) weren't as good because her characters were all assholes. But that first book with Menolly escaping her horrid home to become a Harper was pretty good, though I think I only read it once. (Books I really like I read over and over again.)
I always thought klah was coffee - people often seemed to be grumpy in the morning till they've had their first cup of klah, in a way very similar to coffee-drinkers...
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed almost all the Dragon books (cat-like dragons? really? more horse-like, surely), despite their various problems, when I read them in my teens and 20s. Engaging characters, interesting cultures, readable stories...
I'd probably be much more critical of McCaffrey's writing style now, but I still find the idea of thread scary - 'nasty' is a mild term for stuff that falls from the sky across huge areas of land and sea, and eats through pretty much anything except solid rock.
greenspace: of course you're right about the coffee! My English tendency to see tea everywhere misled me. (I have corrected the post) As for the dragons ... horses in size, yes; but in other respects (clever, sometimes even sly, capable of violence, but somehow suavely loveable, certainly more like equals than beasts of burden) they're feline?
ReplyDeleteAndrea: my edition has 'vice'! Still mine is a UK edition, and perhaps the spelling has been adjusted accordingly.
ReplyDeleteI am here from a link on the daily SF Signal roundup post.
ReplyDeleteThis review takes aim at low-hanging fruit. The Robinton book is an amalgam of all his previous appearances in earlier books with backstory stitched in. It's exactly like the Eddings books about Belgarath and Polgara: the literary version of fanservice. This story is specifically aimed at those readers who want more of the same, and I would say there are not many writers who could do that and still create something even remotely revolutionary. Even if it could be done, I'm not sure it would have fit the bill. It's as if you wrote a sharp takedown of Chicken Soup for the Soul for its lack of political acumen.
The book also wasn't published in 88, it was 98 - and I don't mention that for the purpose of pedantry but to point out that this was contemporary with the falloff of her writing ability. McCaffrey's one of my comfort reads, so I'll tolerate a lot - but the Acorna books, the second Petaybee trilogy, the third Pegasus book? Every time since 1997 that I've seen a new book from her, it made me, not anticipatory, but hopeful for something I knew I wasn't likely to get, and wishing her editors had been more concerned with her legacy. I'm sure they were feeling the Stephen King problem, but some of what went to print is unreadable. The last books of hers that I tried, Catalyst and Catacombs, are half written from the perspective of the barque cats from the Tower series, and are actively painful - I could not finish the second one. The Dragonriders series is no different; you have to go three books before Masterharper of Pern to get to the last one that was a really solid book, Dragonsdawn. It's really not shocking that this one was a poor showing.
The book is certainly a volume on its own, and can fairly be plucked from the shelf to be reviewed independently. This review is also a single review, and I haven't gone back to look for earlier ones to give you a full shot at showing off your reviewing chops. Such are the risks of the written word. Your choosing to review a book that follows a baker's dozen of full novels in the same series, written by a now-deceased writer who was at the time slipping into her dotage, makes you seem overly mean-spirited.
You also run afoul of the biggest risk of comedic criticism - losing your critical thrust in the search for punchlines. The Dragonrider series is purposely written about a parallel development with medieval Europe due to a purposeful regression of a colony from Earth to an agrarian society on a new planet. There's no reason for it to be Chaucerian, and there's no anachronism happening, since it's set in our future. The line about castles and potions was some pretty lazy review writing, if we're going to be critical of cliche.
That being said, if your primary goal WAS humor, then the standards for good critique do ease off. As a MSTie, I'm all for a certain amount of friendly meanness, though I still think you could choose a better target. However, whoever the punching bag, the tradeoff is that you do have to actually be funny when doing it. Harpos? Ooh, burn.
youmaywhistleforme: I accept your factual correction with gratitude, and have amended the post.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise: you ... what, agree the book is a bit crap ('low hanging fruit') but take exception to the way in which I make that point? Fair enough. I daresay I have, as you say, fallen afoul of the biggest risk of comedic criticism. I wouldn't use the phrase 'fallen afoul of ...' myself, but only because of the way it is expressed, not because of what it expresses. Maybe one day I will manage actually to be funny in writing a review, and will cease thuswise falling afoul. Until then, if you send me your contact details I will refund the money you spent accessing this blogpost.
Though I very muchly enjoyed the first several Pern books, my most recent memory of AM is now this Thog passage from http://thog.org/longer.html :
ReplyDelete' "Had the Hivers but known they had met their match in Jeff Raven and Angharad Gwyn aka the Rowan as partners, they might have quit while they were ahead."
"Not while there were Hiver queens needing planets to colonize," Clancy put in.
"And that, of course, brought the entire FT&T organization in at the time of the Deneb Penetration with the Rowan as the focus for the Mind Merge that helped Jeff Raven despatch the Hiver Scouts trying to depopulate his home world.
"And why the Mrdinis decided to ask us, through Mother and Dad, to join forces and defeat the Hivers," Thian said, "since we could take out a Hiver Sphere without having to resort to suicide missions." He leaned back again, pleased with his summation of the events leading up to recent developments ...'
(As Langford says, the fact that the first speaker is referring to _his own grandparents_ when speaking of "Jeff Raven and Angharad Gwyn aka the Rowan" is splendid enough; but that he then goes on to congratulate himself on his As-You-Know-Bob "summation of the events" is marvellous.)
Since "Angharad" isn't a name I come across in fiction (or anywhere else) very often, it seemed as if the Angharad referred to was the Angharad from Kingsley Amis' THE OLD DEVILS. which would be different.
ReplyDelete